Dear EffectHouse Team,
I am writing to respectfully request a reconsideration of the current monetization criteria, particularly regarding the minimum number of valid videos and the duration of monetization eligibility.
Currently, the requirement of a minimum of 5,000 valid videos to access monetization presents a significant challenge for many content creators, especially those who are still growing their presence on the platform. Lowering this threshold would provide more creators with the opportunity to benefit from the monetization program, thereby encouraging higher quality and more consistent content production.
Additionally, I kindly suggest extending the monetization period beyond the current limit of one month. A longer duration would offer creators more stability and motivation to invest in their content, ultimately contributing to the overall growth and engagement on the platform.
Thank you for considering these suggestions. I believe that these adjustments would be mutually beneficial for both creators and the TikTok community as a whole.
Sincerely,
Cristiano Bartel
I’m interested in the part where monetization lasts a little over 30 days (maybe 60) because the best effects always go globally viral after about a month… Example: My LEGO AI Filter started to get more exposure after a month.
6 Likes
I think this has been said time and time again, but i too would like to see the threshold of 5k lowered and I’ve always said that the number of days should start when you reach that criteria. currently its quite hard to get to the 5k within the 30 days and this does make you question how much time to spend creating them.
4 Likes
Totally agree with the suggestion to extend the monetization period. 30 days is really short to hit 5,000 VALID videos. It’s not impossible, but it’s definitely tough, especially for smaller accounts. Sure, we could try collaborating with TikTok influencers to boost visibility, but their fees are pretty high. And honestly, the reward from a qualified effect won’t be enough to cover that kind of cost.
Plus, a lot of times our filters only start to gain real traction after they’ve been live for more than a month. So having a longer monetization window would really help give those effects the time they need to perform naturally.
7 Likes
The effects I create often become mere showcase items after a 30-day evaluation period. Despite investing significant time and effort, I am left with no tangible outcome. Moreover, certain systemic limitations are creating major issues.
To date, my effects have been used billions of times. However, my personal gain remains zero. This is because if an effect goes viral after the 30-day window—say, on the 40th day—it is no longer considered for rewards. Consequently, many effects with genuine viral potential are excluded. I believe the 30-day limit should be reconsidered, or alternatively, a reward system should be introduced for effects that exceed a certain usage threshold, regardless of timing.
I haven’t produced any new effects for a long time because I’ve lost my motivation. In a system that doesn’t fairly compensate creators for their contributions, sustainable productivity becomes nearly impossible. I sincerely hope that a more equitable and long-term reward system will be introduced soon. Thank you in advance for your attention and understanding.
1 Like
So when will i be monitized? Oh i got my 1st violation i rthiught 24 hours its 3 days latrr and i still have it but you kept the scammer and i got in trouble
1 Like